Obtrusive controls on food supply and distribution are a major constraint on exports. They aren’t also good for India’s fiscal health In the backdrop of increase in international price of wheat (courtesy, Ukraine crisis) early this month, Prime Minister Narendra Modi, had exhorted that India can help meet the global requirements of food deficit countries, provided the World Trade Organisation (WTO) allows it. He also exuded confidence that this had created an opportunity for Indian farmers to increase their income. Even as stakeholders were gearing to undertake export with several of them having signed contracts, on May 13, 2022, the Director General of Foreign Trade (DGFT) put a ban on wheat export with ‘immediate’ effect. The exports under government-to-Government arrangements...
More
Comments are closed
Category: WTO agreements
India’s ambitious wheat export plan could come under WTO lens
Amidst the Ukraine crisis, supplies of wheat from Russia and Ukraine have been disrupted, leading to a steep increase in its international price. In this backdrop, sitting on plenty of wheat stock, Prime Minister Narendra Modi has exhorted that India can help meet the global requirements, provided the World Trade Organisation (WTO) allows it. The caveat merits serious consideration. India runs a mammoth programme of public stockholding (PSH) for food security purposes. Under it, agencies of the government like the Food Corporation of India (FCI) buy agri-produce such as wheat, rice/paddy, coarse cereals, from farmers at the minimum support price (MSP) and distribute at a heavily subsidised price of Rs 1/2/3 per kg through a network of fair price shops...
More
Comments are closed
Public stockholding initiative at WTO
India wants the upcoming 12th Ministerial Conference in Geneva to take up ‘total exemption for support to public stockholding for food security’ In the run up to the 12thWorld Trade Organization (WTO) Ministerial Conference scheduled to be held from November 29, 2021, India has made two submissions. One, subsidies given for maintaining food security programs of developing countries should be allowed without any limit and two, member countries who give trade distorting farm subsidies in excess of $10 billion should eliminate them within three years. India runs a mammoth program of public stockholding for food security purposes. Under it, agencies of the Government like the Food Corporation of India (FCI) buy agri-produce such as wheat, rice/paddy, coarse cereals from farmers...
More
Comments are closed
Export subsidies face WTO challenge
The leeway to withdraw subsidies was meant for those developing nations which in 1995 had GNI in excess of $1,000 per capita. It can’t be availed by India, which is in a different category The Coronavirus pandemic played havoc with the economy of the country during the first half of last year. However, exports were beginning to look up in March — touching a record $34 billion which was higher than $33 billion in March 2019 — and signalling a sharp increase during the current fiscal. But now, the exporters face a triple whammy. First, they have not received export benefits worth approximately Rs 35,000 crore under the Merchandise Export from India Scheme (MEIS). Under the MEIS, which was withdrawn...
More
Comments are closed
Hobson’s choice on farm subsidies
The Government may consider DBT to farmers; India can give it without any cap and yet remain compliant with its commitment under the WTO At the Trade Policy Review (TPR) meeting held at the World Trade Organisation (WTO) in January, India insisted that a permanent solution for public stockholding to serve the food security objective special safeguard measures (SSMs) to prevent import surges and elimination of unfair farm subsidy entitlements of some members should be taken up on a priority basis for any farm deal that may be worked out at the 12th WTO Ministerial Conference (MC-12) scheduled to be held from November 29. For about two decades, India has been taking up at the WTO these core agriculture issues that are...
More
Comments are closed
Protecting agri-subsidies at WTO – ‘Hobson’s choice’
At the Trade Policy Review (TPR) meeting held at WTO (World Trade Organisation) in Geneva (January, 2021), the Indian delegation led by the commerce secretary, A Wadhawan insisted that (i) permanent solution for public stockholding to serve the food security objective; (ii) special safeguard measures (SSMs) to prevent import surges and (iii) elimination of unfair farm subsidy entitlements of some members should be taken up first on priority for any farm deal that may be worked out at the 12th WTO Ministerial Conference (MC 12) scheduled to be held from November 29, 2021. Ever since the launch of Doha Development Round (DDR) (2001) (as the title suggests, this was meant primarily to address the issues of concern to the developing...
More
Comments are closed
Trade policy – India needs to open up
In a report on developments in India’s trade policy on the occasion of the seventh Trade Policy Review of India during January 6 – 8, 2021, World Trade Organization (WTO) has noted “export restrictions and import prohibitions imposed by India seem to be in contradiction with its main trade policy goal, of increasing its share of global exports from 2% in 2015 to 3.5% by 2020”. Four areas which have come under WTO focus are (i) high import tariff and frequent changes thereof, minimum import prices and other import restrictions; (ii) export taxes, export restrictions/licensing; (iii) frequent use of anti-dumping measures; (iv) high subsidies and need to reduce these to free up resources for investment particularly in development of the infrastructure....
More
Comments are closed
An unreliable shield
Since the subsidy given to rice farmers has exceeded 10 per cent, India has violated its WTO commitment and invoked the ‘peace clause.’ But how much immunity will this give to it? In a notification submitted to the World Trade Organisation (WTO) — the multilateral body which binds member countries to a common set of rules with regard to trade in goods and services with “fairness” and “non-discrimination” as its underlying principles — India has informed that the value of its rice production during 2018-19 marketing year was $43.67 billion and for that, it provided subsidies worth $5 billion. This works out to 11.4 per cent of the value of rice production. Under the Agreement on Agriculture (AoA) of the WTO, a...
More
Comments are closed
Peace Clause – unreliable shield against subsidy breach
In a notification submitted to the World Trade Organization [WTO] – the multilateral body which binds member countries to a common set of rules with regard to trade in goods and services with ‘fairness’ and ‘non-discrimination’ as its underlying principles – India has informed that the value of its rice production during 2018-19 marketing year was US$ 43.67 billion and for that it provided subsidies worth US$ 5 billion. This works out to 11.4% of the value of rice production. Under the Agreement on Agriculture [AoA] of the WTO, a developing country cannot give aggregate measurement support [AMS] – an acronym for subsidies in WTO parlance – in excess of 10% of the value of its agricultural production. The AMS...
More
Comments are closed
No big deal
Staying clear of the optics and bonhomie on display all through the US President’s recent visit to India , one gets a sense that the road to even a limited trade deal is thorny Prior to the maiden visit of US President Donald Trump to India, there was a sense of dejection about the possibility of the US and India signing even a limited trade deal, leave aside a major one. This is to be seen in the backdrop of the absence of United States Trade Representative (USTR) Robert Lighthizer from the delegation. Earlier, too, Lighthizer had cancelled a visit to New Delhi when he was scheduled to wrap up discussions on a trade agreement. However, the mood was buoyant at the...
More
Comments are closed