According to a survey by NITI Aayog, nearly 2/3rd of the farmers don’t favor direct benefit transfer [DBT] of fertilizer subsidy. It is not clear whether this view is representative of the vast swathe of the farming community [there are over 145 million farm households] in India. If, it is indeed the case and this is also the current thinking of the policy makers then, this would leave one shell shocked as this would tantamount to complete reversal of the thought process. In Budget for 2012-13, the then government had announced linking subsidy payment to manufacturers to the sale of fertilizers to farmers by retailers. Pilot projects in 10 districts spread over nine states were to be run; after successful...
More
Comments are closed
Category: Targeting subsidies
Why DBT of fertiliser subsidy won’t happen anytime soon
A panel under Niti Aayog member Ramesh Chand has recommended direct benefit transfer [DBT] of fertilizer subsidy with the stated objective to “dis-incentivize farmers from excessive use, ensure delivery to the end-user and reduce outgo on subsidy.” The intent is to launch the scheme in three-four months DBT for fertilizer has been on the radar of policymakers for three decades. In July 1991, vowing to eliminate fertilizer subsidy in three years — under pressure from the International Monetary Fund and World Bank — the government had increased prices of all fertilizers by 40%. However, fearing political backlash, the hike was restricted to 30%, with a proviso that small and marginal farmers will be exempt from it. The Centre gave money...
More
No comments
DBT of fertilizer subsidy – a cruel joke
Early this year, the finance ministry and NITI Aayog mooted a road-map for direct benefit transfer [DBT] of fertilizer subsidy and alluded to club this with assistance @ Rs 6000/- per annum being given under PM-KISAN and give the total amount as quasi–universal basic income transfer. To begin with, this will be run on trial basis in select districts to cover small and marginal farmers only. However, full scale implementation pan-India will be possible in 2-3 years. The finance ministry/NITI Aayog were to put up the proposal to the new government for latter’s approval. But, there was no announcement in the budget for 2019-20 presented by the finance minister, Nirmala Sitharaman on July 5, 2019. Now, a panel under Niti...
More
No comments
Opt for a reformist approach
The Government’s failure to bring a comprehensive set of reforms for the fertiliser sector is a missed opportunity. Glaring anomalies need to be fixed to harness long-term potential. Having returned to power for a second term with a thumping majority, it was expected of the Modi Government to kick off immediate reforms for the fertiliser sector. Being just the beginning of the five-year term, now is the golden opportunity for it to opt for big bang reforms as any adverse fall-out in the short-run (inevitable when harsh measures are implemented) won’t pose any threat to the Government. Alas, it missed the opportunity. Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman’s Budget, too, had no mention whatsoever of substantive issues pertaining to the fertiliser policy even as...
More
No comments
Modi 2.0 fails to kick off fertilizer reforms
Having been returned to power, we were looking forward to Modi kick off reforms in the fertilizer sector which were ignored by successive governments in the past. The expectation was legitimate as any reform measure is bound to affect stakeholders in the immediate short-run but that is unlikely to pose any threat to the government which has a mandate to run for full five years and it does not have to face the electorate before this. So, now was the golden moment to go for the big bang. But, the union budget presented by finance minister, Nirmala Sitharaman on July 5, 2019 has belied the expectation. There is no reference to fertilizers even as the allocation for fertilizer subsidy at...
More
No comments
Direct action needed for direct benefits
In its present form, the fertiliser DBT scheme has many loopholes. In the interest of the farmers, the policy needs an overhaul so that they can put subsidy to best use and enhance fertiliser-use efficiency. Will the new Government have the will to do so? The Ministry of Finance and NITI Aayog are working towards preparing a roadmap to directly transfer fertiliser subsidy to the farmers. The data being used to give Rs 6,000 per year to 120 million small and marginal farmers under the Pradhan Mantri Kisan Samman Nidhi will be used for this purpose. The subsidies on fertilisers along with PM Kisan deposits will serve to give a quasi-universal basic income transfer to the farmers. The proposal will be put...
More
No comments
Fertilizer subsidy – DBT still a far cry
The ministry of finance and NITI Aayog are working on a road-map for direct benefit transfer [DBT] of fertilizer subsidy to farmers. The data base being used for giving Rs 6000/- per year to 120 million small and marginal farmers under PM Kisan Samman Nidhi – to be extended to cover all farmers [as promised in BJP election manifesto] – will be used for this purpose. DBT on fertilizers plus support under PM-KISAN will be given as quasi–universal basic income transfer. The proposal will be put up for consideration by the new government immediately after it takes charge. To begin with, this will be implemented on trial basis in select districts to cover small and marginal farmers only. However, full...
More
No comments
Fertilizer subsidy – timely payments, a far cry!
The direct benefit transfer [DBT] scheme for fertilizer subsidy was launched at the beginning of Rabi 2017-18 crop season [October 2017 – March 2018] in certain parts of India and progressively extended to cover all the 31 states and union territories [UTs] – starting from April 1, 2018. Its stated objectives were: (i) ensure timely subsidy payments to the manufacturers; (ii) clearing the backlog and (iii) plugging pilferage and leakages in the system. Have these been achieved? To seek an answer to these questions, let us capture a few basics about fertilizer pricing and subsidy. To make fertilizers affordable to farmers, the union government follows a policy of controlling their maximum retail price [MRP] at a low level unrelated to the...
More
No comments
Fertiliser subsidy:policy reforms needed, not tinkering
Considering the crucial role played by fertilisers in increasing food production and the overarching need to make it affordable to farmers, the union government has followed a policy of controlling their maximum retail price (MRP) at a low level, unrelated to the cost of production and distribution. To ensure that production is viable at this price, it gives subsidy to the manufacturer to reimburse the difference between the two. In case of urea, the subsidy varies from unit to unit and is administered under the New Pricing Scheme (NPS) whereas for decontrolled complex fertilisers, a ‘uniform’ subsidy fixed on per nutrient basis is given to all manufacturers under the Nutrient Based Scheme (NBS). Since this is subject to submission of...
More
No comments
Fertilizer subsidy payments assured within a week – a joke!
Considering the crucial role played by fertilizers in increasing food production and the overarching need to make it affordable to farmers, the union government has followed a policy of controlling their maximum retail price [MRP] at a low level unrelated to their cost of production and distribution which is higher. To ensure that production is viable at this price, it gives subsidy to the manufacturer to reimburse the difference between the two. The amount of reimbursement is known as subsidy. In case of urea, the subsidy varies from unit to unit and is administered under the New Pricing Scheme [NPS] whereas for decontrolled complex fertilizers, a ‘uniform’ subsidy fixed on per nutrient basis is given to all manufacturers under the...
More
2 comments