If the government wants to restrict subsidised supply only to small and marginal farmers having landholding size <2 hectares, this will require two streams of supplies in the distribution channels viz. The Union government controls the maximum retail price (MRP) of urea at a low level, unrelated to the cost of production and distribution, which is much higher. —————————————————————————————————— Reportedly, the government is likely to fix nutrient-based subsidy (NBS) rate for urea before rolling out the direct cash transfer (DCT) of urea subsidy to farmers’ accounts. The subsidy, expressed as rupees per hectare, will be based on soil health, and size of landholding. The idea of NBS for urea is not new. It was recommended, in 2012, by a...
More
3 comments
Category: New Pricing Scheme (NPS) for Urea
Fertilizer – half-baked reforms won’t deliver
According to report in a leading economic daily [citing an official involved in policy making], “the government is likely to fix nutrient-based subsidy [NBS] rate for urea before rolling out the direct cash transfer [DCT] of urea subsidy to farmers’ accounts. The subsidy – fixed on per hectare – will not be universal for farmers across the country and will be based on soil health and size of the landholding. Tenant farmers would also be eligible to get the subsidy on production of valid tenancy documents. To assess the implications, let us first take a look at the existing dispensation of subsidy on urea and non-urea or phosphate [P] and potash [K] fertilizers and how the two differ. How will...
More
Comments are closed
Why PM Modi must not give up on fertiliser DBT
DBT will save the government quite a lot on the subsidy by eliminating misuse and ensuring better targeting through Aadhaar linkage The manufacturers of non-urea fertilisers are given ‘uniform’ subsidy (on per nutrient basis) under the nutrient based scheme (NBS). —————————————————————————————————– According to a survey by NITI Aayog, nearly two-thirds of the farmers don’t favour direct benefit transfer (DBT) of fertiliser subsidy. If this is also the thinking of our policymakers, then it would leave one shell shocked as it would be tantamount to a complete reversal of the process set in motion a couple of years ago. In FY17, the government launched pilot projects for linking subsidy payments to producers, for the sale of fertilisers to farmers by retailers...
More
Comments are closed
Mounting fertilizer subsidy arrears – struggling industry
At the beginning of 2019-20, the amount owed by the Government of India [GOI] to fertilizer manufacturers as subsidy arrears was Rs 39,000 crore. According to the Director General, The Fertiliser Association of India [FAI] – an umbrella organization of fertilizer industry- as on November 1, 2019, this was Rs 33,691 crore to [including Rs 20,853 crore under Direct Benefit Transfer (DBT) scheme and balance Rs 12,838 crore other than DBT]. The FAI expects the arrears to touch Rs 60,000 crore by March, 2020. The persistence of fertilizer subsidy arrears is not an unusual phenomenon. It has been there for decades with the only difference that the amount involved has escalated over the years. During the 80s and early 90s,...
More
Comments are closed
Why DBT of fertiliser subsidy won’t happen anytime soon
A panel under Niti Aayog member Ramesh Chand has recommended direct benefit transfer [DBT] of fertilizer subsidy with the stated objective to “dis-incentivize farmers from excessive use, ensure delivery to the end-user and reduce outgo on subsidy.” The intent is to launch the scheme in three-four months DBT for fertilizer has been on the radar of policymakers for three decades. In July 1991, vowing to eliminate fertilizer subsidy in three years — under pressure from the International Monetary Fund and World Bank — the government had increased prices of all fertilizers by 40%. However, fearing political backlash, the hike was restricted to 30%, with a proviso that small and marginal farmers will be exempt from it. The Centre gave money...
More
No comments
Opt for a reformist approach
The Government’s failure to bring a comprehensive set of reforms for the fertiliser sector is a missed opportunity. Glaring anomalies need to be fixed to harness long-term potential. Having returned to power for a second term with a thumping majority, it was expected of the Modi Government to kick off immediate reforms for the fertiliser sector. Being just the beginning of the five-year term, now is the golden opportunity for it to opt for big bang reforms as any adverse fall-out in the short-run (inevitable when harsh measures are implemented) won’t pose any threat to the Government. Alas, it missed the opportunity. Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman’s Budget, too, had no mention whatsoever of substantive issues pertaining to the fertiliser policy even as...
More
No comments
Modi 2.0 fails to kick off fertilizer reforms
Having been returned to power, we were looking forward to Modi kick off reforms in the fertilizer sector which were ignored by successive governments in the past. The expectation was legitimate as any reform measure is bound to affect stakeholders in the immediate short-run but that is unlikely to pose any threat to the government which has a mandate to run for full five years and it does not have to face the electorate before this. So, now was the golden moment to go for the big bang. But, the union budget presented by finance minister, Nirmala Sitharaman on July 5, 2019 has belied the expectation. There is no reference to fertilizers even as the allocation for fertilizer subsidy at...
More
No comments
Direct action needed for direct benefits
In its present form, the fertiliser DBT scheme has many loopholes. In the interest of the farmers, the policy needs an overhaul so that they can put subsidy to best use and enhance fertiliser-use efficiency. Will the new Government have the will to do so? The Ministry of Finance and NITI Aayog are working towards preparing a roadmap to directly transfer fertiliser subsidy to the farmers. The data being used to give Rs 6,000 per year to 120 million small and marginal farmers under the Pradhan Mantri Kisan Samman Nidhi will be used for this purpose. The subsidies on fertilisers along with PM Kisan deposits will serve to give a quasi-universal basic income transfer to the farmers. The proposal will be put...
More
No comments
Fertilizer reforms – Modi’s report card
The term of the Modi – government will come to an end in a little over two months from now. It is time to take stock of what it has done to the fertilizer sector which was suffering from several policy weaknesses at the time it took charge and there was great deal of expectation that it would kick off major reform. The four major areas which needed focused attention were (i) control on all critical aspects hampering initiatives by manufacturers to reduce cost, improve efficiency and innovate; (ii) imbalance in fertilizer use affecting crop yield, soil health, environment and sustainability of agriculture; (iii) shortfall in supply of gas, feedstock/fuel in production and high price; (iv) increasing subsidy and its...
More
No comments
Urea dilemma – control versus decontrol
On the eve of its Annual Seminar [2018], the Fertiliser Association of India [FAI] – an umbrella organization of all fertilizer manufacturers/importers – has reiterated its demand for removing controls on the fertilizer industry. It has also asked the government to give subsidy directly to the farmers instead of routing it through the manufacturers as at present. In case however, the government continues with control and routing subsidy through the manufacturers then, it demands a fair deal in terms of admissibility of various elements of cost viz. fixed cost, feed/fuel and other costs under the New Pricing Scheme [NPS] for determining the subsidy amount to be reimbursed to them. Further, considering that the maximum retail price [MRP] of urea is...
More
No comments