The scheme mooted by the Delhi Government will only create more avenues for the middlemen to make money at the cost of the taxpayer Arvind Kejriwal, Chief Minister, National Capital Territory (NCT) of Delhi has justified his much-trumpeted scheme for door-step delivery of ration on the ground that this will help rein in what he describes as ‘ration mafia’ while ensuring that every grain of the subsidized food reaches the person (read: the poor) for whom it is intended. Who is this ‘ration mafia’? How does it plunder the subsidized food? Can the scheme prevent it? Under the National Food Security Act, 2013, the Union Government directs the Food Corporation of India and other state agencies to procure food from...
More
Comments are closed
Category: Pricing Policies & Subsidies
Dealing with ‘ration mafia’
Arvind Kejriwal, Chief Minister (CM), National Capital Territory (NCT) of Delhi has justified its much trumpeted scheme for door-step delivery of ration on the ground that this will help reining in what he describes as ‘ration mafia’ while ensuring that every grain of the subsidized food actually reaches the person (read: the poor) for whom it is intended. Who is this ‘ration mafia’? How does it plunder the subsidized food? Can the scheme prevent it? To get to the bottom of it, we need to see as to how the existing system of distributing food to the beneficiaries works. Under the National Food Security Act (NFSA) (2013), the Union Government directs the Food Corporation of India (FCI) and other state...
More
Comments are closed
How about reining in food subsidy?
Even as the Govt has mustered courage to give a truthful account of the money it spends on food subsidy, there is nothing on the horizon to indicate that this will be reined in In the Union Budget for 2021-22, Finance Minister (FM) Nirmala Sitharaman has given a pleasant surprise. This has to do with the Government’s decision to discontinue with the decades-old practice of so-called “off-Budget liabilities” this time around. “Off-Budget liabilities” is a fancy nomenclature used by governments to denote transfer of certain expenses incurred by the Union Government to the books of its agencies tasked with the implementation of its welfare schemes. This helps the former show lower expenses on its own books, thereby, helping it bring down fiscal...
More
Comments are closed
Legalising MSP will prove to be anti-farmer
Out of about 150 million farmers, a mere 8% of them get to sell their produce to the state agencies In the continuing stalemate over the three farm laws, the biggest sore point is the insistence of the agitating farmers that the MSP (minimum support price) should be legally guaranteed. At present, the Centre notifies MSP for 23 farm items. The Food Corporation of India (FCI) and other state agencies buy paddy and wheat, besides a few other items such as coarse cereals and pulses, at the MSP. These are meant for feeding the public distribution system (PDS) and giving food to beneficiaries at heavily subsidised prices under the National Food Security Act (NFSA). Out of about 150 million farmers,...
More
Comments are closed
Food subsidy – fudging stops, what about reining in
In the Union Budget for 2021-22, the Finance Minister, Nirmala Sitharaman has given a pleasant surprise. This has to do with the Government’s decision to discontinue with the decades old practice of so-called “off-budget liabilities”. A technique used by successive regimes in the past, this is a fancy nomenclature to denote transfer of certain expenses incurred by the Union Government to the books of its agencies tasked with the implementation of its welfare schemes. This helps the former show lower expenses on its own books thereby helping it bring down fiscal deficit to the desired level. A typical case relates to the Food Corporation of India (FCI) through which it administers its mammoth program of delivering food subsidy. Under the...
More
Comments are closed
Agri – reforms stymied, course correction needed
In an unprecedented order delivered on January 12, 2021, the Supreme Court (SC) has stayed the implementation of the three laws on agricultural marketing reforms enacted by the Modi – Government in September, 2020. The top court normally intervenes if a law passed by the Parliament is either beyond its legislative competence or is unconstitutional in as much as it violates the basic structure of the constitution. In the instant case, none of these reasons apply. In fact, the SC has not yet examined the constitutionality or otherwise of the laws (a petition in this regard is already pending with it). Then, what has prompted the court to take recourse to such an extraordinary step. Tens of thousands farmers –...
More
Comments are closed
Legalizing MSP is anti-farmer
The anger of agitating farmers over the three farm bills enacted in September, 2020 refuses to subside. Despite a categorical assurance by the Prime Minister, Narendra Modi that the MSP (minimum support price) will continue and that the government was prepared to give this in writing, they are unfazed. Their leaders are insisting that all sales of agricultural produce including those outside APMC (Agricultural Produce Market Committee) mandis – now permitted under the Central law viz. Farmers’ Produce Trade and Commerce (Promotion and Facilitation) Act, 2020 – should be made at MSP and that this must be provided for in the Act. At present, the Centre notifies MSP for 23 agri-items, however, this MSP has no legal sanction. The Food...
More
Comments are closed
Farm Laws: Centre must not yield to ‘mandatory MSP’
Mandatory MSP and Levies on non-APMC markets will be an assault on the reforms the Union government has ushered in with the new farm laws Currently, under the APMC system, a farmer has to pay three levies on the produce she brings to the mandi, notified by the state government under its APMC Act. —————————————————————— To address the concerns of agitating farmers over the three farm bills enacted in September, the Union minister for agriculture & farmers welfare, NS Tomar, has agreed to consider (i) strengthening the APMC (Agricultural Produce Market Committee) by imposing levies at ‘uniform’ rate on purchase at APMC and non-APMC platforms—latter now permitted under the Farmers’ Produce Trade and Commerce (Promotion and Facilitation) Act, 2020; and...
More
Comments are closed
Don’t kill the goose that lays the golden egg
In a bid to accommodate the concerns of agitating farmers over the three farm bills enacted by Modi – government in September, 2020, the Union Minister for Agriculture & Farmers Welfare, Narendra S Tomar has given positive signal on following points:- (i) require every trader transacting with the farmers to register (under the extant law, the former only needs to have PAN number); (ii) in the event of dispute, allow farmer to go to higher courts (the present law provides for dispute resolution at magistrate’s level); (iii) strengthen the APMC (Agricultural Produce Market Committee) by imposing levies at ‘uniform’ rate on purchase at APMC and non-APMC platforms – transactions at the latter are permitted following enactment of the Central law...
More
Comments are closed
Plug the leaks
The Government should stop selling food at a subsidised price through the PDS. Instead, it should limit its role to crediting subsidy directly to the accounts of beneficiaries Since 2014, the Narendra Modi Government has weeded out close to 44 million bogus ration cards by using the Information Technology (IT) infrastructure viz. digitisation, seeding of Aadhaar on ration cards, electronic point of sale machines at retail shops and so on. However, this addresses only a small aspect of the problem and that, too, is unlikely to be rooted out completely with the use of technology alone. Besides, large-scale diversion and black marketing of grain, inclusion of the privileged among beneficiaries, a ballooning subsidy bill and so on will persist so long as...
More
Comments are closed