The Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs (CCEA) has recently approved subsidy for urea to be produced by Talcher Fertilizers (TFL) – a joint venture of 4 public sector undertakings (PSUs) viz. Coal India Limited (CIL), GAIL (India), Rashtriya Chemicals and Fertilizers (RCF) and Fertilizer Corporation of India (FCI). The TFL is setting up the urea plant with installed capacity of 1.27 million ton per annum at Talcher (Odisha) at an estimated investment of Rs 13,277 crore and is expected to be commissioned by September 2023. The project is based on use of coal gasification technology. According to the union commerce minister, Piyush Goal, the CCEA has given its approval for “a specific subsidy to promote this innovative technology for the...
More
Comments are closed
Category: Retention Price Scheme (RPS)
Fertile for Reform: Rational use of urea — Chasing a mirage?
The govt must free up urea pricing and opt for direct transfer of fertiliser subsidies to farmers; no other steps to curb urea misuse will work Second, the need for a comprehensive action plan to increase the MRP of urea was recognized by the Dr GVK Rao committee on Consumer Price of Fertilizers (1987). Over the last five years, the Narendra Modi-led government has made several efforts to tackle diversion, hoarding, black marketing and excessive use of urea—a widely-used fertiliser that accounts for nearly half of India’s total fertiliser consumption. These include (i) mandatorily requiring all manufacturers/ importers to do neem-coating of urea supplies (2015); (ii) making disbursal of subsidy to manufacturers conditional upon actual sales to farmers and sales getting...
More
Comments are closed
Hoping for a coronavirus-induced fertilizer reforms
Even as Prime Minister Narendra Modi has declared his intent to use Covid–19 as an opportunity to implement big bang reforms, the government is silent on fertilizers – a sector that has been crying for reforms for far too long. To put things in perspective, let us take a look at some basic facts on existing policies. Prior to the 1990s, both urea –main source of nitrogen (N)–and phosphate (P) and potash (K) fertilizers such as di-ammonium phosphate (DAP) and a whole range of complex fertilizers containing N, P&K in different proportion etc, fell under pricing and distribution controls. The maximum retail price (MRP) of each fertilizer was controlled at a low level and excess of cost of production and...
More
Comments are closed
Mounting fertilizer subsidy arrears – struggling industry
At the beginning of 2019-20, the amount owed by the Government of India [GOI] to fertilizer manufacturers as subsidy arrears was Rs 39,000 crore. According to the Director General, The Fertiliser Association of India [FAI] – an umbrella organization of fertilizer industry- as on November 1, 2019, this was Rs 33,691 crore to [including Rs 20,853 crore under Direct Benefit Transfer (DBT) scheme and balance Rs 12,838 crore other than DBT]. The FAI expects the arrears to touch Rs 60,000 crore by March, 2020. The persistence of fertilizer subsidy arrears is not an unusual phenomenon. It has been there for decades with the only difference that the amount involved has escalated over the years. During the 80s and early 90s,...
More
Comments are closed
Fertilizer reforms – Modi’s report card
The term of the Modi – government will come to an end in a little over two months from now. It is time to take stock of what it has done to the fertilizer sector which was suffering from several policy weaknesses at the time it took charge and there was great deal of expectation that it would kick off major reform. The four major areas which needed focused attention were (i) control on all critical aspects hampering initiatives by manufacturers to reduce cost, improve efficiency and innovate; (ii) imbalance in fertilizer use affecting crop yield, soil health, environment and sustainability of agriculture; (iii) shortfall in supply of gas, feedstock/fuel in production and high price; (iv) increasing subsidy and its...
More
No comments
Urea dilemma – control versus decontrol
On the eve of its Annual Seminar [2018], the Fertiliser Association of India [FAI] – an umbrella organization of all fertilizer manufacturers/importers – has reiterated its demand for removing controls on the fertilizer industry. It has also asked the government to give subsidy directly to the farmers instead of routing it through the manufacturers as at present. In case however, the government continues with control and routing subsidy through the manufacturers then, it demands a fair deal in terms of admissibility of various elements of cost viz. fixed cost, feed/fuel and other costs under the New Pricing Scheme [NPS] for determining the subsidy amount to be reimbursed to them. Further, considering that the maximum retail price [MRP] of urea is...
More
No comments
Tata exit from fertilizers – symptomatic of deeper malaise
Tata Chemicals Limited [TCL] made headlines on August 10, 2016 by announcing sale of its urea business [it has a plant in Babrala, Uttar Pradesh with 700,000 tons ammonia and 1.2 million ton urea capacity] to Yara Fertilizers India Private Limited [YFIL] – Indian arm of Norway’s Yara lnternational ASA – for a sum of Rs 2670 crores [after obtaining all regulatory approvals and court sanction, the transaction will be consummated within 9-12 months]. TCL had decided to exit fertilizers long back. However, a number of earlier attempts had failed as it did not find any taker; even this one is a distress sale and will fetch the company only 2/3rd of the money so far invested. Tata has also...
More
2 comments
‘Make in India’ skips fertilizers
Even as Modi – government has unleashed a wave of reforms to accelerate the pace of foreign direct investment [FDI] and give a boost to prime minister’s flagship “Make in India”, fertilizers happens to be one sector that has been completely bypassed. While, indigenous production in all segments of this crucial industry continues to languish, the most neglected is DAP [di-ammonium phosphate; it contains 18% nitrogen [N] and 46% phosphate [P]] where traders have hey-day at the expense of domestic industry. Of the total DAP consumption in India, nearly 60% is met from imports. India is the single biggest buyer of DAP in global market with a share of more than 50 per cent of globally-traded DAP. Even for domestically-manufactured...
More
No comments
Perception vs reality
BAD SUBSIDIES : The only way to remove fertiliser subsidy is through direct benefit transfer in place of routing subsidy through the industry. Addressing a global business summit recently, Prime Minister Narendra Modi for the first time, shared at length his thinking on subsidies. He said, “We have to eliminate bad subsidies, whether or not they are called subsidies. But, some subsidies may be necessary to protect the poor and the needy and give them a fair chance to succeed. Hence, my aim is not to eliminate subsidies but to rationalise and target them.” He continued: “I am referring to cooking gas, fertiliser and kerosene subsidies. I must confess that I am surprised by the way words are used by...
More
No comments
Bad subsidies – perception vs reality
Addressing the ET Global Business Summit, prime minister, Modi for the first time ever, shared at length his thinking on subsidies. The relevant excerpts are reproduced below:- “We have to eliminate bad subsidies, whether or not they are called subsidies. But, some subsidies may be necessary to protect the poor and the needy and give them a fair chance to succeed. Hence, my aim is not to eliminate subsidies but to rationalize and target them. I have been referring to cooking gas, fertilizer and kerosene subsidies. I must confess that I am surprised by the way words are used by experts on this matter. When a benefit is given to farmers or to the poor, experts and government officers normally...
More
No comments