Category: Production vs imports

Self-reliance in fertilisers

Potash (K), and phosphate (P) are among the three major plant nutrients (the third being nitrogen or ‘N’) needed for increasing the production of foodgrains and other agricultural products. Their requirements are met mostly from imports. A farmer sprinkles fertiliser on paddy crop in Koppal district. The enactment of two laws, viz. the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Amendment Act, 2023, and the Offshore Areas Mineral (Development and Regulation) Amendment Act, 2023, in the monsoon session of Parliament bodes well for the Indian fertiliser sector. While the first law paves the way for the auction of critical minerals such as potash and phosphate blocks for exploration and processing in India, the second law provides a fixed 50-year production lease for offshore minerals....
More Comments are closed

‘Indigenous’ fertilisers must be explored

The government must pursue indigenous sources of fertiliser raw materials to minimise India’s vulnerabilities on imports The enactment of two laws viz. The Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Amendment Act, 2023 and the Offshore Areas Mineral (Development and Regulation) Amendment Act, 2023 in the just concluded monsoon session of the parliament bodes well for the Indian fertilizer sector. While the first law paves the way for the auction of critical mineral potash (besides lithium and graphite) blocks for exploration and processing in India, the second provides a fixed 50-year production lease for offshore minerals. Potash or ‘K’ is amongst the three major plant nutrients (the other two being Nitrogen or ‘N’ and Phosphate or ‘P’) needed for increasing production...
More Comments are closed

Nano urea and some tall claims

Can nano urea help in achieving the stated objective? Can it help to make a dent in the subsidy? The government spends huge sums on fertiliser subsidy — the likely expenditure during the current financial year being about Rs 2,50,000 crore. Credit: AFP Photo Launching an ambitious programme for the promotion of liquid nano fertilisers at the two-day ‘Kisan Samman Sammelan’ at the Indian Agricultural Research Institute (IARI) on October 17, Prime Minister Narendra Modi exuded confidence that it would help attain self-sufficiency in the crucial sector and help farmers enhance their income while substantially reducing the impact on the environment. Already, the Indian Farmers Fertiliser Cooperative Limited (IFFCO) — a major fertiliser manufacturer — is producing indigenously-developed nano urea at its Nano Biotechnology Research...
More Comments are closed

Nano fertiliser move can be a game changer

Nano fertilisers not just promise to cut down subsidy burden but also improve the income of farmers  Inaugurating function of the two-day “Kisan Samman Sammelan” at the Indian Agricultural Research Institute (IARI) on October 17, Prime Minister Narendra Modi announced two major policy initiatives — “One Nation, One Fertiliser” scheme under which all fertiliser manufacturing and market companies will sell all subsidized fertilisers under a single brand Bharat; and promote use of liquid nano fertilisers. While the government intends to use “One Nation, One Fertiliser” scheme to reduce the criss-cross movement of fertilizers that will eventually help reduce freight subsidy bills and make quality fertilizer available at lower cost, adoption of liquid nano urea is meant to help attain self-sufficiency...
More Comments are closed

Fertiliser fears come to fore due to war

The crisis in Ukraine following the invasion by Russia has exposed the chinks in the Indian fertiliser industry. Despite predictions by successive governments during the last four decades that India would become self-reliant on the fertiliser front and putting in place policies aimed at achieving the goal, the country remains preponderantly dependent on imports for meeting the requirements of its farmers. The three most popular fertilisers used by farmers are urea, di-ammonium phosphate (DAP) and muriate of potash (MOP), which are the major sources of nitrogen, phosphate and potash respectively. Natural gas is the raw material/feedstock/fuel used for the manufacture of urea whereas phosphoric acid and ammonia are the prime raw materials (RMs) needed for making DAP. In the case...
More Comments are closed

The war’s impact on our fertiliser industry

Had there been a free market scenario, the industry would have come under serious strain. But that is not to be as fertilisers are under control The crisis in Ukraine following invasion by Russia has sent shock waves through out the world economy. In India, even as the steep rise in energy import bill will affect almost all sectors of the economy, the impact on fertilizers will be more pronounced. At the outset, let us capture a few relevant facts. Despite prognostications by successive governments during the last four decades or so that India would become self-reliant in fertilizer availability and putting in place policies aimed at achieving the goal, even today, the country remains preponderantly dependent on imports for...
More Comments are closed

Ukraine crisis – impact on Indian fertilizer industry

The crisis in Ukraine following invasion by Russia has sent shock waves through out the world economy. In India, even as the steep rise in energy import bill will affect almost all sectors of the economy, the impact on fertilizers will be more pronounced. At the outset, let us capture a few relevant facts. Despite prognostications by successive governments during the last four decades or so that India would become self-reliant in fertilizer availability and putting in place policies (in particular pricing and subsidy policies) aimed at achieving the goal, even today, the country remains preponderantly dependent on imports for meeting the requirements of its farmers. Three most popular fertilizers used by farmers are urea, di-ammonium phosphate (DAP) and muriate...
More Comments are closed

Making urea that is not needed: New Talcher urea project will further worsen the unsustainable fertiliser subsidy burden

The new urea project at Talcher will worsen the already unsustainable fertiliser subsidy burden as retention price at this project may surpass the current high of $350/tonne The RP in turn, is calculated taking into account efficiency norms such as capacity utilisation, energy consumption, capital related charges (CRC), other fixed cost, delivered cost of gas and other inputs, etc. The Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs (CCEA) has recently approved subsidy for urea to be produced by Talcher Fertilizers (TFL) —a joint venture of four PSUs: Coal India Limited (CIl), GAIL, Rashtriya Chemicals and Fertilizers (RCF), and Fertilizer Corporation of India (FCI). TFL is setting up the capacity of 1.27 million tonne per annum at Talcher, Odisha, at an estimated investment of Rs 13,277...
More Comments are closed

Curbing urea use by half

On December 5, 2017, in his Mann Ki Baat radio address, the Prime Minister said, “Can our farmers take a pledge to reduce urea use by half by 2022? If, they promise to use less urea in agriculture, the fertility of the land will increase and the lives of farmers will start improving.” For this, Modi had in mind a time frame of 5 years Currently, there is excessive use of urea — a dominant source of ‘N’ vis-à-vis complex fertilizers such as diammonium phosphate (DAP) the main source of ‘P’ and muriate of potash (MOP), the main source of ‘K’. This has led to an increasing imbalance in the NPK use ratio. On an all-India basis, currently this ratio...
More Comments are closed

Amidst Corona worries – golden chance to reform

In the early stage of the Covid – 19 crisis and much before it had assumed monstrous dimensions, the international crude oil market was already oversupplied. Then, OPEC [Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries] – a cartel of oil suppliers in the middle-east led by  Saudi Arabia the lead exporter – and non-OPEC suppliers led by Russia sat together to hammer out an agreement to cut production with a view to bring about a semblance of demand-supply balance. But, the agreement eluded them as Russia refused to back even a moderate cut [it would have only served to help US shale-oil companies to run at full capacity – which it didn’t want]. In sync with the past happenings whenever OPEC didn’t...
More Comments are closed