The Bharat brand scheme aims to stabilise prices for consumers and ensure fair compensation to farmers. However, its impact will be limited due to State laws Last year in July, the Union Government launched a Scheme of selling chana dal at a subsidised rate under the Bharat brand call it Bharat Chana. This was followed by launch of Bharat Atta in November 2023 and Bharat Rice in February 2024, Under the Scheme, the Food Corporation of India (FCI) – a central agency whose prime responsibility is to procure, store and distribute food grains to meet the needs of beneficiaries covered under the National Food Security Act (NFSA) – buys the cereals from the farmers and sells to the National Agricultural...
More
Comments are closed
Category: Pricing Policies & Subsidies
MSP methodology and farmer demands
Questions arise about the rationale and implications of adopting Dr Swaminathan’s proposed methodology for MSP calculation Co-terminus with the legal guarantee for Minimum Support Price (MSP) for all crops, another demand raised by the farmers relates to how the MSP is fixed. They want it to be calculated based on the recommendations of the National Commission on Farmers (NCF) under Dr MS Swaminathan (2006). All along, the Commission for Agricultural Costs and Prices (CACP) – a statutory body under the Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare – has been setting MSP at the level of the so-called comprehensive cost or C2 cost. C2 is arrived at by adding three components viz. A2 covers all paid-out expenses, both in cash and...
More
Comments are closed
Farmers’ demands are impractical and unrealistic
The farmers want the Govt to withdraw from the WTO and all Free Trade Agreements, which is next to impossible in a globally interdependent world After three years of hibernation, farmers mostly from Punjab are back on the roads with over a dozen demands from the Union Government. If taken on board, these are sure to spell disaster. The foremost demand is securing legal guarantees for the Minimum Support Price (MSP) of their agricultural produce. MSP is a “minimum price” for any crop that the government considers as remunerative for farmers and hence deserving of “support”. Put into practice in the 1960s under an ‘executive order’, it was meant to assure farmers that they get at least MSP from selling...
More
Comments are closed
MSP guarantee is bad economics
Yet, political parties give because it helps them win elections. MSP representative image. Credit: DH File Photo In the recently concluded state assembly elections, among the various guarantees made by the BJP—Modi’s guarantees—a significant commitment is a hefty increase in the minimum support price (MSP) for paddy and wheat offered to farmers in Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh. In MP, the party promised an MSP of Rs 3,100 per quintal for paddy, a 42% increase from the current Rs 2,183 per quintal fixed by the Centre. For wheat, the promised MSP is Rs 2,700 per quintal, a 27% rise from the existing Rs 2,125 per quintal. In Chhattisgarh, a commitment was made to procure paddy at an MSP of Rs 3,100...
More
Comments are closed
Has free ration become a political compulsion?
Under ‘open-ended’ procurement, Govt buys from farmers unlimited quantities at MSP. Apart from high stocks, this adds to the food subsidy bill substantially Addressing a poll rally in Chhattisgarh, Prime Minister Narendra Modi has announced an extension of the Pradhan Mantri Garib Kalyan Anna Yojana (PMGKAY) free ration scheme for another five years. Launched in April 2020 to deal with the situation triggered by the Covid-19 pandemic, PMGKAY provided 5 kg of rice or wheat per person per month for “free” to 820 million, as well as 1 kg of pulses per family per month to people covered under the National Food Security Act (NFSA). Run for three months initially, the scheme got six extensions till December 31, 2022. On...
More
Comments are closed
Rethink rationale for food subsidy
Most of its actions in implementing the food subsidy scheme are out of sync with the changing times and lead to leakages and corruption The NITI Aayog has invited bids for a Central Coordinating Agency that can study the effectiveness of its National Food Security Subsidy scheme. The Agency will hold the mandate to suggest ways to better the scheme. It will also suggest ‘whether, and how, the scheme can be rationalised or closed’. However, the government’s move to continue the supply of free food grains under the National Food Security Act (NFSA) beyond the current FY gives the contrary signal. In fact, most of its actions in implementing the food subsidy scheme are out of sync with the thought...
More
Comments are closed
Is free food welfare or a freebie?
During FY 2021–22, the economy rebounded, with the GDP registering a growth of 8.9% On January 1, 2023, the Union Government terminated the Pradhan Mantri Garib Kalyan Anna Yojana (PMGKAY). Accordingly, in the Union budget 2023-24, it has reduced allocation for food subsidy from Rs 287,000 crore during 2022-23 (RE) to Rs 197,000 crore. Beginning in April 2020, PMGKAY provided 5 kg of rice or wheat per person per month for “free” via the Public Distribution System (PDS), as well as 1 kg of pulses per family per month to around 820 million families. Run for three months initially, the scheme got six extensions till December 31, 2022. In the unprecedented situation triggered by the Covid-19 pandemic of large-scale job and income...
More
Comments are closed
PMGKAY withdrawn but free food stays
Government should seriously ponder over giving subsidy directly to the beneficiary as the current system is defective After much dilly-dallying, the Union Government has cleared the air on the fate of Pradhan Mantri Garib Kalyan Anna Yojana (PMGKAY). On December 23, 2022, the Cabinet decided to terminate it from January 1, 2023. At the same time, it has decided to provide free ration to about 820 million poor in the country under the National Food Security Act (NFSA) for one year i.e. till December 31, 2023, in a bid “to shield the masses from shocks to the system at a time the economy was recovering in the aftermath of Covid crisis”. Making these announcements, Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution...
More
Comments are closed
The undeserving must not get food subsidy
Financial burden to implement the national food security law has clearly become a major burden for the Government Recently, the Supreme Court in a petition has directed the Union Government to increase coverage under the National Food Security Act, 2013, (NFSA) so that “more and more needy persons and citizens get the benefit”. Under the NFSA, the Centre directs the Food Corporation of India (FCI) and other state agencies to procure food from the farmer at MSP (minimum support price) and organize its distribution to a population of around 820 million people (50 per cent in urban areas and 75 per cent in rural parts) through a network of fair price shops (FPS) at the subsidized price (call it ‘issue...
More
Comments are closed
All price support systems are unviable
Whether it is MSP-based regime or DPPS, both are open-ended, susceptible to ever-increasing subsidy burden, and vulnerable to charge of violation under the WTO Two recent statements by the top brass give a clue as to how the Modi government intends to deal with pricing of farmers’ produce. First, addressing a conference on ‘Getting Agricultural Markets Right’ (July 6), Niti Aayog member Ramesh Chand proposed the adoption of deficiency price payment system (DPPS) as an alternative to the existing system of minimum support price (MSP). Next, the Union Agriculture Minister ruled out a legal guarantee for MSP. Under the existing system, agencies of the government, such as the Food Corporation of India (FCI), buy agri-produce, such as wheat, rice/paddy, coarse...
More
Comments are closed